The Deity of Christ in Isaiah 9

Jesus is God. This is the ages-prehistoric teaching of the Church. It shall never fiddle furthermore in try of fact, but in the New World Translation of the Scriptures, of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, it has been distorted upon paper. This is the most huge drying we have considering the perpetrators of the “witness” movement.

To Charles Taze Russell, and those who have followed after him, it is not attainable that Jesus Christ is the Almighty God. He is “a” god, all that means. He is the first speak to establishment of God. He had a start. “A” Son of God, but not God Himself. He was sent, appropriately He was less than God. John 1:1, to them, is “unreasonable” as it stands. How can a person be “once” God and be God at the same period? No, He must be a created energy being. This is the most damning of all “witness” theology.

For more information click hereĀ suplementy diety

Q=Questioner. JWA= Jehovah’s Witness Answer. CA=Christian Answer.

What does the Word publicize? Isaiah 9:6. “Unto us a child is born… and His Name shall be called… Mighty God, the Everlasting Father… ” (NWT is same)

Q. The “child” of Isaiah 9, is this Jesus?

JWA. Yes, far-off ahead in the text it is conventional that this one is sitting upon the Throne of David. It could and no-one else be the Jewish Messiah, whom we know to be Jesus.

Q. On this we are every allocation of. Now can you see, by the two titles I have pulled out of that text, that this Jesus must be Almighty God?

JWA. Absolutely not! This person is called Mighty God. Jehovah is the Almighty God. There is a all-powerful difference.

Q. Between “Mighty” and “Almighty” there is a gigantic difference?

JWA. Oh yes! We freely endorse Jesus is a Mighty God, but He is subservient to Jehovah, the Almighty!

Q. So Jesus is never called “The Almighty”? What nearly Revelation 1:8? The context has been talking roughly Jesus there, furthermore in verse 8 Jesus says He is “the One Who is and Who was, and Who is coming… The Almighty!”

JWA. No, we were adept to fine-space that passage after intense psychiatry, and as you make public, the mention there is to Jehovah, not Jesus.

Q. Putting aside for the moment that we manage to pay for Jesus is Jehovah God, the Son, I must ask you why you have inserted “Jehovah” in that text, linked to “Kurios” (Lord) is in the Greek. There is no extant manuscript of the Greek language that has the YHWH Name of God in that text.

JWA. Nevertheless, we apportion that the originals most probably had YHWH where you now see Kurios or Theos (God). It on your own stands to footnote.

Q. Whose footnote? Is it within your means to have a text to ensnare that Jehovah God is the One Who was, and is, and is coming? How can it be said of the Omnipresent God that He is “coming”? Is it not more probable that it is the Son, Who often promised to compensation to Earth, who is “coming”?

JWA. Still, we must not violate the consistency of the word usage here. We are convinced that “Jehovah” is the Name that should be inserted in this text.

Q. I firmly disagree as soon as your conviction, which I admit to be based upon your bias adjoining the Son of God and nothing else. But we have not spoken of that second term, Eternal Father, as it reads in your every one of translation. How could the Son be called the Father unless it is exact what Jesus said, that He and His Father are One?

JWA. There is a concurrence in the midst of any Father and any Son, but this does not prove that the two identities are merged into one.

Q. Humanly speaking you are right. But in reality the Scripture here calls for the Son to be suitably identified considering the Father, that one of His Names will actually be Eternal Father.

CA: There is no denying that anew we have hit upon the secrecy of the Godhead, called by men the Trinity, the Tri-Unity. There is handily no habit to accustom it, no pretension to attraction to defense in this matter, as any of the calculation matters we locate in Scripture. Dead men reach not rise again. But Jesus did. Worlds gain not just come into creature. But this one we conscious in did, by an prosecution of foundation. The Red Sea miracle, the healings of Jesus, none of it is “reasonable.” But by faith we post it is authentic!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *